This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1753944709104495v1 3/3/187    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Forleo, G. B. Articles by Tondo, C. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Forleo, G. B. Articles by Tondo, C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Atrial fibrillation: cure or treat?

Cardiac Arrhythmia and Heart Failure Research Institute, St Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Catholic University of Sacred Heart. Piazza Carlo Forlanini, 1. 00151, Rome, Italy

Claudio Tondo

Cardiac Arrhythmia and Heart Failure Research Institute, St Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Catholic University of Sacred Heart. Piazza Carlo Forlanini, 1. 00151, Rome, Italy, c.tondo{at}tiscali.it

Controversies exist with regard to the optimal management of atrial fibrillation (AF). Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm is a desirable goal in AF patients because the prevention of recurrences may improve cardiac function, relieve symptoms and should reduce the likelihood of adverse events. Pharmacological therapy for AF has been disappointing with unacceptable rates of AF recurrence and other proarrhythmic sequelae. Recent studies suggested that potential benefit of sinus-rhythm maintenance with respect to mortality may have been neutralized by harmful effects of currently available antiarrhythmic therapies. Because of the inefficacy and dangers with nonablative therapies currently available for maintaining sinus rhythm, alternative treatments are certainly desirable. Curative treatment of atrial fibrillation with catheter ablation is now a legitimate option for a large number of patients. In several studies AF ablation has consistently been demonstrated to be superior to antiarrhythmic medications for the maintenance of sinus rhythm. Nevertheless, many aspects of the therapy are still controversial and large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this approach.

Key Words: atrial fibrillation • catheter ablation • antiarrhythmic medications

This version was published on June 1, 2009

Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, Vol. 3, No. 3, 187-196 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1753944709104495


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?